Trove Tuesday – Did the family ever contact back home?

27 June 2017

One of the questions I have always asked myself was – did my immigrant ancestors ever have contact with the family members back home? In some cases there have been surviving letters which do show that letters and photographs were exchanged with those left behind. In other instances I have absolutely no idea.

Adkins Robert Spencer, image courtesy State Library of Queensland

Adkins Robert Spencer, image courtesy State Library of Queensland

Henry Spencer was the fourth child of Paul Spencer and Louisa Adkins and he had seven other siblings. Henry was the first to come out to Queensland and was followed by his brother Adkins Robert Spencer and a married sister Louisa Ault at different times. There was nothing in the family that indicated contact back home but given that three siblings came out suggests they kept in touch.

Brisbane Courier 27 Nov 1902 Spencer v Pitt District Court

Paul Spencer was a successful and wealthy chemist and census returns show that the family had servants. When Paul died in 1890 there was a substantial probate record and similarly when his wife Louisa died in 1896 there was still a considerable legacy.

When I discovered the probate records some years ago, I wondered if Henry (and his two other siblings in Australia) had been beneficiaries. Trove has helped to show that there was a legacy and it was mentioned in a court case. Where else?? And it wasn’t even Henry Spencer’s court case! This just goes to show you really do need to look everywhere.

In the Brisbane Courier, 27 Nov 1902, under the District Court heading of A R Spencer v Chas Pitt a lot of family laundry was aired. Adkins  Robert Spencer was Henry’s brother and Charles Pitt was Henry’s father in law. The trial was to ascertain if Charles Pitt was indebted to Henry Spencer at any time. It was alleged that Henry had lent Charles 100 pounds after he had received a legacy of nearly 1000 pounds.

When Henry Spencer wanted to buy a hotel at Torbanlea he asked Pitt for the money back. Pitt only gave him 20 pounds back and Henry alleged another 80 pounds was owing.

I had seen references to a Henry Spencer as a licensee of various hotels but as it is a common name, I wasn’t sure if it was him. Now I can follow up this Torbanlea reference and the other references and perhaps learn more about what Henry was doing before he left Queensland for Tasmania.

In his defence Charles Pitt said that no money was owing because when his daughter (Henry’s wife) died, Charles Pitt took all the children and looked after them for 13 years. Therefore the money was ‘a gift in consideration of the consequent obligation’.

I’m not certain why Adkins Spencer was named as the plaintiff or why he was involved on behalf of his brother. The newspaper does not give the outcome of the trial but it does name the jurors. Next time I am at the Queensland State Archives I will have to look for the District Court file and see if there are more details. This is one of the reasons Trove is so useful – most of the court files are not indexed and if you don’t know the year it can be a lengthy search. Thanks to Trove I have the name of the Court and the date and can go straight to the relevant series and file.

But this article answers my immediate questions – Henry Spencer did receive a legacy following the deaths of his parents and he must have still been in contact with the family back in Staffordshire. It also answers what happened to the children after his wife died. I knew that he had married again and had another family but there was never any suggestion that his children from the first marriage were with this second family. He went on to have a third marriage and yet another family and we only learnt about the previous two families when we finally tracked down his death and obtained the death certificate.

This type of detail on the family would be almost impossible to locate without the ability to search digitised newspapers with keywords. Also search for siblings and other collateral lines because they may also lead to information on a direct ancestor. Once again Trove has provided more clues to follow up in original records.

Thanks Trove.

Related Posts

Accentuate the Positive Geneameme 2023

Accentuate the Positive Geneameme 2023

I invite you to take part in this activity by responding to the following statements/questions, several of which are new, in a blog post. Write as much or as little as you want and complete as many statements as you wish. If you wish to take part and don't have a...

RootsTech 2023: the in-person view of a first timer

RootsTech 2023: the in-person view of a first timer

RootsTech 2023 has come and gone, and this report is a bit delayed as I spent a further three weeks in the USA. A few days in Florida in Fernandina Beach with a friend then off to Fort Lauderdale for a 7 night cruise in the Caribbean. We visited the Bahamas, Jamaica,...

Report on Family History Down Under November 2022

Report on Family History Down Under November 2022

It was good to finally attend FHDU 2022 a four-day event in person after the delays of Covid. Getting to Castle Hill in Sydney and staying at the Hills Lodge was not cheap but worth it. Most of the speakers were staying there and quite a few of the attendees who I...

Review of Sands of Time Conference Redcliffe October 2022

Review of Sands of Time Conference Redcliffe October 2022

Despite the very unkind weather over the weekend, the Sands of Time genealogy conference was a big success. Three days of genealogy at the Dolphins Leagues Club at Redcliffe, Queensland. Just down the road from where I live if you don’t factor in the highway traffic....



Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.